Regular blog readers might have noticed my gradual shift from brow-beating about antivirus to an almost muteness about the need.

The truth is, I’m careless I don’t feel a compelling need to use anti-virus software. (Go get the pitchforks and torches.)

android virus

“But what about the security!?”

“Oh for shame,” you say, and my admission probably cost me a good number of subscribers. But the truth is, I don’t think anti-virus is all too necessary. In fact, I’ve secretly ran (i.e. not telling a soul) without antivirus software on my phone for almost 1 year. I’ve checked the status occasionally, and guess what, no infections. (I wasn’t surprised.) And of course, plenty of people will browse across this post and shame me for “my lack of concern about client confidentiality.”

I know, you’ve heard about the large number of devices infected with viruses, malware, and other maladies.  Like every good foot soldier, you followed the charge to install “the best” virus protection. And so you hunted, settling on one of the top few apps — probably Lookout, Kaspersky, Norton, or avast!.

Truthfully, I’m not convinced that malware or viruses are really a big issue. At least if you’re in the United States, Canada, or even UK, because of the various levels of security.

First, Google gave a lengthy discussion about the various layers of security built into Android.

Android Layered Defense

These are passive and active layers, and also require some human interactions to ensure security. Two of the most important rings in the protection bubble are Google Play and the individual.

Google Play

I purchase and download almost all of my applications from Google Play. If you’ve followed Android for very long, then you’ll know that Google stepped up its efforts to bump bad apps before they even reach the Play Store for sale. I think you could pretty safely bet that Play Store catches 80-85% of the malicious apps. You’ll have a greater risk of a malicious app if you’re downloading apps from a non-Google Play market.

Personal protection

The second important ring is the individual user. I’ve become much more aware of each individual application that I install, and I’ve taken a more diligent approach to reading the application’s permissions before clicking “accept.”

More importantly, I refuse to open applications, or click links, from individuals I don’t know, and I don’t install any apps that want me to look at “glamour hunnies” or “sexy babes.” These are almost certainly malware-infected applications. I have a core set of functions that I perform on my devices. An app or an individual that wants me to go outside of that comfort zone must have a compelling reason for the deviation.

If I do have questions about the app or process, I’m diligent about check some of the many Android forums, or even just performing a quick search on Google. Usually one of the top results will give me the information I need. Good developers will develop good applications because their reputations are at stake.

But what about the children!?

My kids are an issue because they’re tempted to install every fun looking application in Google Play. I’ve donated my old devices to my children — check out for some deals on phones — and each has a very restricted account in Google Play.

They can’t install paid applications, and they have to verify each app install with me. It’s a hassle, annoying, and somewhat painful process, but I want them to know I’m always watching. I do occasionally check their device for “bad apps,” and they’ll lose the phone if I find one — don’t tell them, but I don’t ever remember whether I’ve approved the app, or not.

The risks: is the no antivirus movement for you?

My decision to ditch antivirus comes after a long and careful process. I’m also very aware of the risks. And finally, I’m certainly not advocating that you abandon antivirus (although I kind of did, didn’t I?). My point is that I think antivirus makes us a little less diligent in our own security. We forget to not click on bad email links or visit malicious sites.

Android users in the United States, Canada, or UK should probably focus more on their lockscreen security (or WiFi snooping) than Android malware. Personal accountability has a lot to do with being protected.

What do you think? Am I set to catch the next version Android Ebola?

Jeff Taylor

I'm just an ordinary guy living an extraordinary life. I'm also an attorney and I blog about Android for lawyers. You can follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, or Google+.


Greg · September 13, 2014 at 7:04 am

Same here. Just don’t see a need and they ate resource hogs. Not the case however with my laptop.

    Jeff Taylor · September 13, 2014 at 7:38 am

    Resource hogging is a big issue. I’m almost ready to argue that desktop virus can isn’t necessary, with. For the same reasons. Almost.

Wayne · September 13, 2014 at 7:45 am

Yeah, you don’t need anti-virus for Android. It’s a waste. You also don’t need the little “battery saver” apps. If you are rooted, just use Greenify. Works wonderfully well.

Fred Rodriguez · September 13, 2014 at 3:48 pm

Glad to hear you say this. I uninstalled Lookout yesterday because it was persistently freezing. Maybe I don’t need it after all.

    Jeff Taylor · September 13, 2014 at 8:15 pm

    There are other options, and I’m quite satisfied not having antivirus.

      iamwayne1969 · September 13, 2014 at 8:23 pm

      You are right about not being able to connect in the secured “work environment”, but not all of us are attorneys. About the battery life, I can send you a screenshot of my phone, if you like? Also, those antivirus apps all have security concerns, especially Lookout, it’s notorious.

        Jeff Taylor · September 13, 2014 at 8:32 pm

        Just wait. More companies will start enacting similar protocols, especially if they’re Google for Work. Being an attorney has nothing to do with it.

        A screenshot doesn’t prove anything. It’s insight, but we really benchmarks and other exhibits.

        Plus, like any scientific study, we need a control device to test against. Also, since few, if any devices, run the same programs under same conditions, we would need that baseline.

        Once again, too many variables to really show that rooting a device has a more significant effect than an unrooted device.

Mark Olberding · September 13, 2014 at 6:34 pm

I run a Razr Maxx and I run Avast. I does not take too much from the total system and it gives me peace of mind; so I will continue. I also am not rooted (not knowledgeable enoug) so I like my Battery Doctor. It is probably overkill but I have never objected to making the ruble bounce

    Jeff Taylor · September 13, 2014 at 8:14 pm

    I don’t think you’ll regret either decision, to stay or go. It’s personal choice, and both come with their own set of risks or rewards.

iamwayne1969 · September 13, 2014 at 7:25 pm

I would recommend rooting any Android device. All of the bad publicity concerning it, is just that. I didn’t know anything either, but there are a lot of resources out there and plenty of people who will help. One of the best benefits of rooting your device is the battery life. I currently have 49% on my Galaxy Note 3 after 1 day and almost 10 hours since the last charge.

    Jeff Taylor · September 13, 2014 at 8:07 pm

    The problem with rooting, at least for some, is that if you’re in a company running strict security protocols hat will block compromised devices, a rooted device won’t connect. Google for Work admins have an option to block compromised devices. Toast.

    Jeff Taylor · September 13, 2014 at 8:09 pm

    Also, despite the continuous claims of extended battery life, I have yet to see any concrete evidence of that fact.

    Yes, there are tweaks and small manipulations to eek some juice, but those are generally for more skilled users, not average individuals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *